AI Implementation Failures in Real-World Deployments

The S&P study on Generative AI asserts that, “The percentage of companies abandoning the majority of their AI initiatives before they reach production has surged from 17% to 42% year over year, with organizations on average reporting that 46% of projects are scrapped between proof of concept and broad adoption.” 

Implementation failures are occurring regularly, including some AI hiring systems discriminating against applicants, content moderation AIs suppressing protected speech, and recommendations potentially pushing agendas (and radicalizing users as a result). What may seem like small problems are causing larger impacts than intended, but what does this mean for those digesting it or being impacted? 

We’ve all had first-hand experience or awareness of a situation where a product did not live up to the advertisement or hype. Artificial Intelligence is no exception to this tendency, but the way it plays out is unique because AI is comparatively new in the industry. In this article, we are going to take a look at business trends with AI, common shortcomings in the purchased products, the consequences of poor implementation, and what can be done about it. 

AI Business Trends 

Currently, a few of the biggest trends in AI include agents (also called agentic AI), data analysis (with a heavy focus on ingestion and augmentation), and business automation (which applies to customer service, supply chain optimization, and process automation) 

There is notable overlap in these areas, including their shared intent of finding shorter paths to task completion without sacrificing quality of service. Can a call agent complete a customer request satisfactorily in the majority of cases? Can an AI agent personalize recommendations to a webstore customer or help prevent fraud for online transactions? Can AI automation expedite payroll by performing the steps from time records through pay slip creation and direct deposit? 

Yes, it can. These trends improve business efficiency while reducing errors, even if some of us miss the inter-person interaction when we have a complaint. 

While these AI applications show tremendous promise, the reality of implementation tells a different story. 

Common Shortcomings in AI Implementation 

The reasons for these shortcomings are not singular. They happen in part because of the way models are tested, in a known state. Another reason is misalignment in the implementation case, meaning the framework or environment in which these are set does not align with the test/development environment in which the AI Model was trained (read as, the test did not match production).  

Another challenge arises from the additional functions promised alongside or beyond AI implementation. While this is not technically a shortcoming of AI itself, it does reflect a common gap in the supporting services claimed to be included with AI, which tout the ability to add features post-implementation. These services frequently underperform, creating the perception that the AI system has failed to meet expectations. 

Lastly, the gap between what an AI system can actually accomplish and the way that marketing sells its capabilities can be vast. The conflation of terms, the struggle with expectations, and the need to apply a cookie-cutter sales format can push a concept within buyers that is not unique to AI but can often cost an organization a lot more financially. 

A recent MIT study, The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025, stated in one of its most notable findings that “…only 5% of custom enterprise AI tools reach production.”  Other details in the study showcase how the appropriate prioritization of resources in implementation would provide better results. 

The three primary reasons for why AI systems fail to reach production are: 

• The solution does not match the problem
  • With the exception of situations like the one described above where the mismatch occurs at the outset, if the solution does not match the problem, then AI implementation failure will likely occur. This can also happen because the desire to achieve what is possible shifts to become a desire to achieve all things possible. Instead of this scattershot approach, teams should maintain clear focus on the project at hand, directed at addressing a problem or customer need, and treat implementation as an iterative process that builds over time. 

• Data issues 
  • Entire books written on this issue would still fail to capture the full scope of this problem. From unstructured data to inaccurate attributes, the ability to point to causal data elements and derive consistent outcomes becomes more difficult with larger amounts of data. Yes, this is the ‘magic’ of AI, but it cannot happen without direction. 
  • Imagine you walk into a grocery store and pick up ten random ingredients with no directions or recipe in mind. Could you make a decent meal? Yes. Will you? Unlikely. Next, consider if an experienced chef (equating this with a trained model) selects 10 random ingredients, would they produce a good meal? Chances are they would, but you'd likely never choose that restaurant again for a consistent dining experience. To put this in context, according to Gartner, by the end of 2025 at least 30% of generative AI (GenAI) projects will be abandoned after proof of concept due to poor data quality, inadequate risk controls, escalating costs, or unclear business value 

• Inadequate infrastructure  
  • An organization would never try to build a new office building without considering essential logistical needs like staff parking or electrical capacity. Similarly, AI initiatives require adequate computing power, network bandwidth, and data storage infrastructure. Without these foundations, even successful pilots hit bottlenecks when scaling—turning a promising 95% accuracy rate in testing into a 60% failure rate in production. 

Consequences of Poor AI Implementation 

The number of crestfallen executive staff when looking at an AI system that did not live up to their expectations is too great to enumerate. When implemented poorly, the company already invested a great sum of money and employee time in a series of tasks that are not being met. Amazon's four-year investment in their biased hiring algorithm resulted in complete project abandonment, serving as a cautionary tale which executives across industries now reference in AI strategy meetings. 

This can even be so severe that the only positive takeaways are the lessons learned in AI implementation and the due diligence which can be performed ahead of time. 

How to Avoid Poor AI Implementation 

The good news is that much of the advice below can apply to your strategy for other services as well. 

Let’s begin by understanding the ask at hand. This involves much more than just considering what you want the AI to accomplish. This step requires you to define the path between the problem and the solution. It will include the data elements or tools at hand (not all AI works with all coding language frameworks). As found in the Gartner Data and Analytics Priorities and Challenges insights, getting data into a state where AI can make use of it is a very necessary preparatory step. This step will also aid in knowing what an organization is working with to have a clear ROI or AI-provided function, along with how that will then be measured 

Next, you should have an understanding of the AI solution capability. Moving beyond the sales terms, you need to consider what case studies can be made to demonstrate that the system will work. Consider if the capabilities align with the previous step to connect the points to a successful implementation. 

Also consider if a test run can be demonstrated. This will likely require a separate environment which mirrors production, but the ability to showcase success here is very encouraging. Third-party providers can shine here. Purchasing AI tools from specialized vendors and building partnerships succeed about 67% of the time, while internal builds succeed only one-third as often (The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025). 

When drawing up the contract, include timeframes, milestones, a list of functions, and key metrics. Each of these elements can be used to hold the provider accountable and also document the first step with the provider. 

Similar to any project, the implementation of AI rarely goes perfectly according to plan, and staff must have dedicated resources and time to achieve the desired result. These actions lead directly to the final consideration. 

Lastly, don’t oversell your solution. You may be thinking that step sounds obvious, but it can be an uphill struggle when ambition and the desire to gain market differentiation are put into words. 

Take Action Before You Become a Statistic in AI Implementation 

Don't let your organization become part of the 42% that abandon AI initiatives or the 95% that fail to reach production. Start by conducting an honest assessment, considering the following: 

• Does your data meet AI-ready standards? 
• Does the infrastructure have the ability to scale beyond proof of concept? 
• Can you clearly articulate the specific business problems your AI initiative will solve? (arguably the most important consideration) 

Begin with a focused pilot project that addresses a single, well-defined challenge rather than trying to achieve all things possible. Partner with specialized vendors who have documented success in your industry—remember, partnerships succeed 67% of the time compared to just 33% for internal builds.  

The cost of inaction is not just missed opportunities – it is watching competitors who implement AI strategically pull ahead while you are stuck debugging failed pilots. The window for AI advantage is narrowing, but the pathway to success is clear. 

This leaves the remaining question: not whether AI will transform your industry, but whether you'll be leading that transformation or explaining to stakeholders why competitors got there first. 

Want to learn more about AI? We have an AI Summit coming up in November. Register here for a day of education, exercises, and networking.